Research Article | Published: 31 July 2025

Ethnobotanical studies of important tree species used by Sherdukpen tribe of Arunachal Pradesh, India

Niraj Rai, Madhubala Sharma, Chaman Lal Sharma, Govinda Pangging and Mahesh Wangkhem

Journal of Non-Timber Forest Products | Volume: 32 | Issue: 2 | Page No. 131-137 | 2025
DOI: https://doi.org/10.54207/bsmps2000-2025-FB4H28 | Cite this article

Abstract

The Sherdukpen tribe, a major ethnic group of West Kameng district in Arunachal Pradesh, possesses rich ethnobotanical knowledge and relies extensively on plant resources. This study aimed to document and evaluate culturally important tree species used by the community. Data were collected from 105 informants across seven villages through questionnaires and personal interviews. A total of 30 tree species, representing 23 genera and 18 families, were recorded and classified into eleven use categories, with Rosaceae as the dominant family. Food category accounted for the highest proportion (25%), while manure category was minimal (2.9%). Gender-based knowledge variation was observed, with women more familiar with food-related species and men with species used for construction, tools, and poison. Pinus wallichiana, Quercus griffithii, and Rhododendron arboreum showed the highest cultural importance. The study highlights diverse utilization patterns and cultural significance of tree resources.

Keywords

Cultural significance, Documentation, Ethnic group, Ethnobotany, Tree Resources

Access Options

250/-

Buy Full Access in HTML Format

Instant access to the full article.

Get access to the full version of this article. Buy Full Access in HTML Format

References

1. Ayantunde, A.A., Briejer, M., Hiernaux, P., Udo, H.M.J. and Tabo, R., 2008. Botanical Knowledge and its differentiation by age, gender and ethnicity in Southwestern Niger. Human Ecology, 36, pp.881–889.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10745-008-9200-7

Google Scholar

2. Camou-Guerrero, A., Reyes-García, V., Martínez-Ramos, M. and Casas, A., 2008. Knowledge and use value of plant species in a Rarámuri community: a gender perspective for conservation. Human Ecology, 36, pp.259–272.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10745-007-9152-3

Google Scholar

3. Chazdon, R.L., and Coe, F.G., 1999. Ethno botany of woody species in second-growth, old-growth, and selectively logged forests of Northeastern Costa Rica. Conservation Biology, 13, pp.1312–1322.  https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1523-1739.1999.98352.x

Google Scholar

4. Dutta, B.K. and Dutta, P.K., 2005. Potential of ethnobotanical studies in North East India: An overview. Indian Journal of Traditional Knowledge, 4(1), pp.7–14.

Google Scholar

5. Eflora of India, 2007 onwards. Database of Plants of the Indian Subcontinent. Accessed at https://efloraofindia.com.

6. Efloras, 2008. Published on the Internet http://www.efloras.org. Missouri Botanical Garden, St. Louis, MO & Harvard University Herbaria, Cambridge, MA.

7. Gupta, V., 2007. Conservation ethos in the tribal folklore. Indian Journal of Traditional Knowledge, 6(2), pp.337–341.

Google Scholar

8. Hammer, O., Harper, D.A.T. and Ryan, P.D., 2008. PAST-Palaeontological Statistics. In ver. 1.81edn. Oslo, NO. Available at:http://folk.uio.no/ohammer/past. Accessed at 14.02.2010.

9. Jain, S.K. and Mudgal, V., 1999. A Handbook of Ethnobotany. Bishen Singh Mahendra Pal Singh, Dehradun, India.

Google Scholar

10. Koppell, C.R.S., 1993. The major significance of minor forest products: the local use and value of forests in West African humid forest zone. Food and Agriculture Organisation, Rome

Google Scholar

11. Kumar, N., Kumar, S., Singh, B., Mishra, B.P., Singh, B., and Singh, V., 2015. Traditional practices of utilization and conservation of non-wood forest products by Adi tribes of Arunachal Pradesh. Journal of Applied and Natural Science, 7(1), pp.111–118. https://doi.org/10.31018/jans.v7i1.573

Google Scholar

12. Lucena, R.F., Arau`jo, P.E.L. and Albuquerque, U.P., 2007. Does the local availability of woody Caatinga plants (Northeastern Brazil) explain their use value? Economic Botany, 61, 347–361.  https://doi.org/10.1663/0013-0001(2007)61[347:DTLAOW]2.0.CO;2

Google Scholar

13. Mao, A.A., Hynniewta, T.M. and Sanjappa, M., 2009. Plant wealth of Northeast India with reference to ethnobotany. Indian Journal of Traditional Knowledge, 8(1), pp.96–103.

Google Scholar

14. Pangging, G., Sharma, M., Sharma, C.L. and Sharma, A.S., 2016. Natural Resource Management in Eastern Himalaya- a case study of fringe villages of Shergaon forest division, Arunachal Pradesh. Current World Environment, 11(3), pp.800–807.  https://doi.org/10.12944/CWE.11.3.15

Google Scholar

15. Pardo-de-Santayana, M., 2003. Las plantasen la culturatradicional de la Antigua Merindad de Campoo. Ph.D. dissertation, Departamento de Biología, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Spain.

Google Scholar

16. Reyes-García, V., Huanca,T., Vadez, V., Leonard, W., and Wilkie, D., 2006. Cultural, practical, and economic value of wild plants: A Quantitative Study in the Bolivian Amazon. Economic Botany, 60 (1),pp.62–74.  https://doi.org/10.1663/0013-0001(2006)60[62:CPAEVO]2.0.CO;2

Google Scholar

17. Shaheen, H., Qureshi, R., Qaseem, M.,  Amjad, M., and Bruschi, P., 2017. The cultural importance of indices: A comparative analysis based on the useful wild plants of Noorpur Thal Punjab, Pakistan. European Journal of Integrative Medicine, 12, pp.27–34.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eujim.2017.04.003

Google Scholar

18. Shaltout,  K.H., Ahmed, D.A., Al-Sodany, Y.M., Haroun, S.A. and El-Khalafy, M.M., 2023. Cultural importance indices of the Endemic plants in Egypt. Egyptian Journal of Botany, 63(2), pp.649–663.

Google Scholar

19. Swain, S. and Mohapatra, G.C., 2013. Multiples usages of forest trees by the tribes of Kalahandi District, Orissa, India. International Journal of Biodiversity and Conservation, 5(6), 333–341.

Google Scholar

20. Tardio, J. and Pardo-de-Santayana, M., 2008. Cultural importance indices: a comparative analysis based on the useful wild plants of Southern Cantabria (Northern Spain). Economic Botany, 62, pp.24–39.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12231-007-9004-5

Google Scholar

21. Thungon, S.D. and Krishnambika, N., 2017. Ethnomedicinal plants used by Sherdukpen ethnic group of Shergaon village, West Kameng District of Arunachal Pradesh. The Indian Forester, 143(5), pp.464–470.

Google Scholar

22. Wezel, A. and Lykke, A.M., 2006. Woody vegetation change in Sahelian West Africa: evidence from local knowledge. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 8, pp.553–567.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-006-9055-2

Google Scholar

About this article

How to cite

Rai, N., Sharma, M., Sharma, C.L., Pangging, G. and Wangkhem, M., 2025. Ethnobotanical studies of important tree species used by Sherdukpen tribe of Arunachal Pradesh, India. Journal of Non-Timber Forest Products, 32(2), pp.131-137. https://doi.org/10.54207/bsmps2000-2025-FB4H28

Publication History

Manuscript Received on 30 April 2024

Manuscript Revised on 14 December 2024

Manuscript Accepted on 21 July 2025

Manuscript Published on 31 July 2025

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content: