Research Article | Published: 30 October 2024

Non-Timber Forest Products-based initiatives for sustainable rural livelihood in Chhattisgarh, India

Himanshu Khandekar, Rajesh Kumar, Aishwary Kant Vaishnav and Alok Singh Bargah

Journal of Non-Timber Forest Products | Volume: 31 | Issue: 3 | Page No. 242-249 | 2024
DOI: https://doi.org/10.54207/bsmps2000-2024-1PO6XL | Cite this article

Abstract

Non-Timber Forest Products (NTFPs) play a crucial role in supporting the livelihoods of millions, particularly in rural and forested areas. These biological resources, excluding timber, encompass items such as food, fodder, fiber, medicinal plants, and materials for household and agricultural use. NTFPs contribute significantly to both subsistence and income, aiding in rural development and poverty reduction. In states like Chhattisgarh, they are closely linked to the cultural traditions and economic well-being of tribal and forest-dependent populations, while also serving as key ingredients in industrial and medicinal products. This paper explores the significance of Non-Timber Forest Products (NTFPs) in Chhattisgarh and analyzes the initiatives directed toward fostering sustainable livelihoods for rural populations.

Keywords

CGMFPFED, Environment, Government, Lac, Market, Sustainability, Tribal

Access Options

250/-

Buy Full Access in HTML Format

Instant access to the full article.

Get access to the full version of this article. Buy Full Access in HTML Format

References

1. Araia, M.G., 2005. Revealing the forest hidden value: the case study of Eritrea. Master’s thesis, University of Stellenbosch, Stellenbosch.

Google Scholar

2. Barbhuiya, A.R., Sharma, G.D., Arunachalam, A. and Deb, S., 2009. Diversity and conservation of medicinal plants in Barak valley, Northeast India. Indian journal of traditional knowledge, 8(2), pp.169-175.

Google Scholar

3. Bargah, A.S., Kumar, R., Khandekar, H. and Vaishnaw, A.K., 2024. A Status of Different Non Wood Forest Products in Chhattisgarh, India. International Journal of Plant & Soil Science. (in press)

Google Scholar

4. Belcher, B.M., 2005. Forest product markets, forests and poverty reduction. International Forestry Review, 7(2), pp.82-89.    https://doi.org/10.1505/ifor.2005.7.2.82

Google Scholar

5. Belcher, B. and Schreckenberg, K., 2007. Commercialisation of non‐timber forest products: A reality check. Development Policy Review, pp.355-377.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7679.2007.00374.x

Google Scholar

6. Bhardwaj, S. and Gakhar, S.K., 2005. Ethnomedicinal plants used by the tribals of Mizoram to cure cuts & wounds. Indian Journal of Traditional Knowledge, 4(1), pp.75-80.  

Google Scholar

7. Brouwer, I.D., Hoorweg, J.C. and van Liere M.J., 1997. When households run out of fuel: responses of rural households to decreasing fuelwood availability, Ntcheu district, Malawi. World Development, 25(2), pp.255-266.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0305-750X(96)00100-3

Google Scholar

8. Campbell, B.M. and Luckert, M.K. (eds) 2002. Uncovering the hidden harvest: valuation methods for woodland and forest resources (Vol. 3). Earthscan.

Google Scholar

9. Campbell, B.M., Luckert, M. and Scoones, I., 1997. Local-level valuation of savanna resources: a case study from Zimbabwe. Economic Botany, pp.59-77. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02910405

Google Scholar

10. CGMFPFED, 2022-23. https://www.cgmfpfed.org/new/annual_report/AGM24_2023.pdf

11. Churpal, D., Gauraha, A.K., Pathak, H. and Tuteja, S.S., 2021. Economically and traditionally important non-timber forest products (NTFPs) of Chhattisgarh. Journal of Pharmacognosy and Phytochemistry, pp.89-92.

Google Scholar

12. Darro, H., Swamy, S.L., Kumar, R. and Bhardwaj, A.K., 2022. Comparison of Physico-chemical Properties of Soils under different forest types in dry tropical Forest ecosystem in Achanakmar-Amarkantak Biosphere Reserve, India. Eco. Env. & Conservation, pp.S163-S169. https://doi.org/10.53550/EEC.2022.v28i08s.026

Google Scholar

13. Dattagupta, S. and Gupta, A., 2014. Traditional processing of non-timber forest products in Cachar, Assam, India. Indian Journal of Traditional Knowledge, 13(2), pp.427-433.

Google Scholar

14. Dutta, B.K. and Dutta, P.K., 2005. Potential of ethnobotanical studies in North East India: An overview. Indian Journal of Traditional Knowledge, 4(1), pp.7-14.

Google Scholar

15. FSI, 2019. India State of Forest Report, 2019. Forest Survey of India, Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change, Dehradun.

Google Scholar

16. Grenand, P., 1992. The use and cultural significance of the secondary forest among the Wayapi Indians. In Mark J. Plotkin & Lisa Famolare (eds), Sustainable harvest and marketing of rain forest products, Island Press,Washington, D.C., pp.27-40.

Google Scholar

17. Grosskinsky, B., 2000. Nutritional contribution of IWFP. In Exploring the potential of indigenous wild food plants in southern Sudan. Proceedings of a workshop held in Lokichoggio, Kenya. USAID, Nairobi.

18. Guinand, Y. and Lemessa, D., 2001. Wild-food plants in Ethiopia: Reflections on the role of wild foods and famine foods at a time of drought. The potential of indigenous wild foods, 22, p.31.

Google Scholar

19. Hadish, G., 2018. Review on the roles of NTFPs for rural livelihood. Journal of Biology, Agriculture and Healthcare, 8(1), pp.10-14.

Google Scholar

20. Hazarika, T.K., 2012. Citrus genetic diversity of north-east India, their distribution, ecogeography and ecobiology. Genetic resources and crop evolution, pp.1267-1280.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10722-012-9846-2

Google Scholar

21. Hazarika, T.K. and Marak, S., 2019. Wild edible fruits of Meghalaya, North-East India: An unexplored potential for nutritional security and economic prosperity. Acta Hortic. 1241, pp.717-727. https://doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.2019.1241.104

Google Scholar

22. Hazarika, T.K. and Pongener, M., 2018. Potential wild edible fruits of Nagaland, North-east India and its significance in the livelihood and nutritional security of rural, indigenous people. Genetic Resources and Crop evolution, pp.199-215.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10722-017-0523-3

Google Scholar

23. Heubes, J., Heubach, K., Schmidt, M., Wittig, R., Zizka, G., Nuppenau, E.A. and Hahn, K., 2012. Impact of future climate and land use change on non-timber forest product provision in Benin, West Africa: linking niche-based modeling with ecosystem service values. Economic Botany, pp.383-397.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12231-012-9216-1

Google Scholar

24. Ingram, V. and Bongers, G., 2009. Valuation of non-timber forest product chains in the Congo Basin. A methodology for valuation. CIFOR.

Google Scholar

25. Kiss, A., 2004. Making biodiversity conservation a land-use priority. In Getting biodiversity projects to work: Towards more effective conservation and development, pp.98-123. Columbia University Press.  https://doi.org/10.7312/mcsh12764-008

Google Scholar

26. Kujur, D., Dutta, J. and Ranga, M.M., 2019. Non Wood Forest Products for Rural Livelihood and Sustainable Forestry with special reference to Chhattisgarh, India. Journal of Environment and Sociobiology, 16(2), pp.231-37.

Google Scholar

27. Lyngdoh, N., Piloo, N., Gab, T., Kumar, M. and Pandey, A.K., 2016. Wild edible fruit tree resources of Arunachal Pradesh, North East India. Journal of Applied and Natural Science, pp.883-889.  https://doi.org/10.31018/jans.v8i2.891

Google Scholar

28. Marshall, E., Schreckenberg, K. and Newton, A.C., 2006. Commercialisation of non-timber forest products: factors influencing success. Lessons Learned from Mexico and Bolivia and Policy Implications for Decision-makers. International Forestry Review, 8(3), pp.368-369.

Google Scholar

29. Masih, S.K., Sharma, C.B. and Sharma, M.C., 2001. NTFP and their price trends in primary tribal markets. Journal of Non-Timber Forest Products, 8(3/4), pp.159-168.  https://doi.org/10.54207/bsmps2000-2001-T01D3X

Google Scholar

30. Mishra, V.K. and Singh, B.P., 2015. An overview on fungal diversity in North East India: options for research and development. Biodiversity in Tropical Ecosystems, pp.287-317.

Google Scholar

31. Negi, V.S., Maikhuri, R.K. and Rawat, L.S., 2011. Non-timber forest products (NTFPs): A viable option for biodiversity conservation and livelihood enhancement in central Himalaya. Biodiversity and Conservation, pp.545-559.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-010-9966-y

Google Scholar

32. Pachuau, L. and Dutta, R.S., 2020. Wild edible fruits of Northeast India: Medicinal values and traditional practices. Herbal Medicine in India: Indigenous Knowledge, Practice, Innovation and its Value, pp.437-450.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-7248-3_27

Google Scholar

33. Pandey, A.K., Tripathi, Y.C. and Kumar, A., 2016. Non timber forest products (NTFPs) for sustained livelihood: Challenges and strategies. Research Journal of Forestry, 10(1), pp.1-7.

Google Scholar

34. Pandey, G., Sharma, B.D., Hore, D.K. and Rao, N.K., 1993. Indigenous minor fruits genetic resources and their marketing status in north-eastern hills of India. Journal of Hill Research, 6(1), pp.1-4.

Google Scholar

35. Pant, P., 2007. Bamboo for life for people and red panda: a study on utilitarian value and management of bamboo and its relation with red panda conservation in Maimjhuwa VDC, Ilam, Nepal. MSc Thesis,Wageningen University, Wageningen.

Google Scholar

36. Paumgarten, F. and Shackleton, C.M., 2009. Wealth differentiation in household use and trade in non-timber forest products in South Africa. Ecological Economics, pp.2950-2959. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2009.06.013

Google Scholar

37. Peres, C.A., Baider, C., Zuidema, P.A., Wadt, L.H., Kainer, K.A., Gomes-Silva, D.A., Salomão, R.P., Simões, L.L., Franciosi, E.R., Cornejo Valverde, F. and Gribel, R., 2003. Demographic threats to the sustainability of Brazil nut exploitation. Science, pp.2112-2114.  https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1091698

Google Scholar

38. Ros-Tonen, M.A. and Wiersum, K.F., 2005. The scope for improving rural livelihoods through non-timber forest products: an evolving research agenda. Forests, Trees and Livelihoods, 15(2), pp.129-148.  https://doi.org/10.1080/14728028.2005.9752516

Google Scholar

39. Ruíz Pérez, M. and Byron, R.N., 1999. A methodology to analyze divergent case studies of non-timber forest products and their development potential. Forest Science, 45(1), pp.1-14.  https://doi.org/10.1093/forestscience/45.1.1

Google Scholar

40. Saha, D. and Sundriyal, R.C., 2012. Utilization of non-timber forest products in humid tropics: Implications for management and livelihood. Forest Policy and Economics, pp.28-40.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2011.07.008

Google Scholar

41. Shackleton, R.T., Le Matre, D.C., van Wilgen, B.W. and Richardson D.M., 2015. Use of non-timber forest products from invasive alien Prosopis species (mesquite) and native trees in South Africa: Implications for management. Forest Ecosystem, 2, p.16.  https://doi.org/10.1186/s40663-015-0040-9

Google Scholar

42. Shackleton, C.M. and Shackleton, S.E., 2004. The use of woodland resources for direct household provisioning. In Lawes, M.J., Eeley, H.C., Shackleton, C.M., Geach, B.S. (eds), Indigenous Forests and Woodland in South Africa: Policy, People and Practice. University of KwaZulu-Natal Press, Pietermaritzburg, pp.195–226.

Google Scholar

43. Shackleton, C.M., Shackleton, S.E., Buiten, E. and Bird, N., 2007a. The importance of dry woodlands and forests in rural livelihoods and poverty alleviation in South Africa. Forest policy and economics, 9(5) pp.558-577.   https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2006.03.004

Google Scholar

44. Shackleton, S., Shanley, P. and Ndoye, O., 2007b. Invisible but viable: Recognising local markets for non-timber forest products. International Forestry Review, 9(3) pp.697-712.  https://doi.org/10.1505/ifor.9.3.697

Google Scholar

45. Shanley, P., Pierce, A.R., Laird, S.A., Binnqüist, C.L. and Guariguata, M.R., 2015. From lifelines to livelihoods: Non-timber forest products into the twenty-first century. Tropical forestry handbook, pp.1-50.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-41554-8_209-1

Google Scholar

46. Sheil, D. and Wunder, S., 2002. The value of tropical forest to local communities: complications, caveats, and cautions. Conservation Ecology 6(2).  https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-00458-060209

Google Scholar

47. Sundriyal, M. and Sundriyal, R.C., 2003. Underutilized edible plants of the Sikkim Himalaya: Need for domestication. Current science, pp.731-736.

Google Scholar

48. Sunderland, T.C., Ndoye, O. and Harrison-Sanchez, S., 2011. Non-timber forest products and conservation: What prospects? In Non-timber forest products in the global context, pp.209-224.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-17983-9_10

Google Scholar

49. Sundriyal, M., Sundriyal, R.C., Sharma, E. and Purohit, A.N., 1998. Wild edibles and other useful plants from the Sikkim Himalaya, India. Oecologia Montana, 7(1-2), pp.43-54.

Google Scholar

50. Ticktin, T., 2004. The ecological implications of harvesting non‐timber forest products. Journal of Applied Ecology, pp.11-21.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2664.2004.00859.x

Google Scholar

About this article

How to cite

Khandekar, H., Kumar, R., Vaishnav, A.K. and Bargah, A.S., 2024. Non-Timber Forest Products-based initiatives for sustainable rural livelihood in Chhattisgarh, India. Journal of Non-Timber Forest Products, 31(3), pp.242-249. https://doi.org/10.54207/bsmps2000-2024-1PO6XL

Publication History

Manuscript Received on 14 August 2024

Manuscript Revised on 16 October 2024

Manuscript Accepted on 22 October 2024

Manuscript Published on 30 October 2024

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content: