Research Article | Published: 01 September 1997

Litter Production and Nutrient Return of Different Tree Species under Plantation Conditions

G. C. Hosur, G. S. Dasog and T. Satyanarayana

Indian Journal of Forestry | Volume: 20 | Issue: 3 | Page No. 231-235 | 1997
DOI: https://doi.org/10.54207/bsmps1000-1997-H1K3ZU | Cite this article

Abstract

A study on patterns of litter production and nutrient return in six tree species of age ranging from 13 to 16 years was carried out at Main Research Station, Dharwad. Litterfall was collected from three quadrats of size 2.25 m2 in each plantation at monthly intervals for one year. Litter was separated into different components like leaf, twig, bark, fruit/pod, flower wherever possible and analysed for nutrient concentration, from which nutrient return was computed.

Litterfall by the tree species studied varied from 4099 kg ha-1 in teak to 8313 kg ha-1 in eucalyptus. Contribution of leaf litter to the total litterfall was more than other plant parts. Plant parts showed variations in nutrient concentrations though generally the concentrations of Ca, K and N were higher than other nutrients. Sissoo returned highest N, P, K and Ca among the six plantations while teak returned least nutrients among the six plantations. The nutrient return followed the order Ca > K > N in sissoo and catechu; Ca > N > K in teak and casuarinas and K > Ca > N in bamboo and eucalyptus. The return of P and Mg were lower in all the cases.

Keywords

Access Options

250/-

Buy Full Access in HTML Format

Instant access to the full article.

References

1. George, M. (1986). Nutrient uptake and cycling in an young eucalyptus hybrid plantation. Myforest, 22:19-26.

Google Scholar

2. George, M. and Varghese, G. (1990). Nutrient cycling in Eucalyptus globules plantation II. Litter production and nutrient return. Indian For., 116: 962-968.

Google Scholar

3. Hassan, M.M. and Nurul Islam, A.T. (1984). The contribution of bamboo and some broad leaved species to the soil organic matter content. Ind. J. Forestry 7:217-220.

Google Scholar

4. Jackson, M.L. (1967). Soil chemical analysis. Prentice Hall Pvt. Ltd., New Delhi.

Google Scholar

5. Pande, P.K. and Sharma, S.C. (1986). Seasonality and pattern in leaf fall and litter accretion on the forest floor in plantations of demonstration area, Dehra Dun. Indian For., 112: 328-340.

Google Scholar

6. Ramam, S.S. (1984). Trends of nutrient concentration, storage and uptake by forest trees. Ind. J. Forestry, 7: 93-102.

Google Scholar

7. Sharma, S.C. and Pande, P.K. (1989). Patterns of litter nutrient concentration in some plantation ecosystem. For. Ecol. Mgt., 29: 151-163.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-1127(89)90046-7

Google Scholar

8. Sugur, G.V. (1989). Litter production and nutrient cycling of different species under plantation conditions. Myforest, 25: 43-49.

Google Scholar

About this article

How to cite

Hosur, G.C., Dasog, G.S. and Satyanarayana, T., 1997. Litter Production and Nutrient Return of Different Tree Species under Plantation Conditions. Indian Journal of Forestry, 20(3), pp.231-235. https://doi.org/10.54207/bsmps1000-1997-H1K3ZU

Publication History

Manuscript Published on 01 September 1997

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content: