Research Article | Published: 01 June 1997

Floristics, Biomass Production and Edaphic Attributes of the Mangrove Forests of Puduvyppu, Kerala

S. Suresh Kumar and B. Mohan Kumar

Indian Journal of Forestry | Volume: 20 | Issue: 2 | Page No. 136-143 | 1997
DOI: https://doi.org/10.54207/bsmps1000-1997-BFI92K | Cite this article

Abstract

A field study was conducted to characterise the floristic diversity, biomass productivity and edaphic attributes of the mangrove forests of Puduvyppu (Kerala). We enumerated all trees and shrubs above 10 cm GBH in 50 quadrats (10 m x 10 m), laid out along an east-west transect. Floristic diversity was generally low with only five tree species (Simpson’ Diversity index, D = 0.14). Despite minor variations in floristic composition along the transect, Avicennia officinalis, an early coloniser, dominated the entire area. It also recorded the highest importance value index, density and basal area. Owing to the juvenile nature of the stand, mean biomass productivity was relatively low (47 t ha-1). Two profile pits were dug, one each in the Avicennia and grassland zones, to characterise the edaphic attributes of the site. Horizon-wise variations in physic-chemical properties (pH, EC, total N, available P, K and exchangeable Na) were quite pronounced. In general, the surface horizons recorded higher values. Mineral element concentration was also higher in the Avicennia zone. Both profiles, however, were characterised by a silty clay texture and blocky structure, indicating profound sediment deposition and inundation. Active fluvial dynamics of rivers draining into the adjoin Vemabanadu lake and/or the dredging operations going on in the adjacent cochin bar mouth are perhaps responsible for sediment deposition. Sand pockets, particularly in the lower layers of the grassland profile also provides supporting evidence in this respect.

Keywords

Access Options

250/-

Buy Full Access in HTML Format

Instant access to the full article.

Get access to the full version of this article. Buy Full Access in HTML Format

References

1. Bismark, M (1987). Ecological aspects and conservation of mangrove forests as Kultai National Park, East Kalmantan, Indonesia. Duta Rimba, 13(87-88): 16-22.

2. Chakrabarthi, K. (1987). Sunderbans mangroves – biomass productivity and resource utilizations, an in-depth study. Indian Forester, 113:622-628.

Google Scholar

3. Curtis, J.T. and Mcintosh, R.P. (1950). The inter-relations of certain analyatic and synthetic phytosociological characters. Ecology, 31434-455.

Google Scholar

4. Hussain, M.Z. (1995). Silviculture of mangroves. Unasylva, 181:46: 36-42.

Google Scholar

5. Jackson, M.L. (1968). Soil chemical analysis. Prentice Hall, New Delhi. 498 pp.

6. Jose, S., Sreepathy, A., Kumar, B.M. and Venugopal, V.K. (1994). Structural, floristic and edaphic attributes of the grassland-shola forests of Eravikulam in peninsular India. Forest Ecology and Management, 65:279-291.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-1127(94)90176-7

Google Scholar

7. Kalliola, R., Salo, J., Puhakka, M. and Rajasilta, M. (1991). New site formation and colonizing vegetation in primary succession on the Western Amazon floodplain. Journal of Ecology, 79:877-901.  https://doi.org/10.2307/2261087

Google Scholar

8. Macnae, W.B. (1968). A general account of the fauna and flora of mangrove swamps and forests in the Indo-West Pacific region. Advances in Marine Biology, 6:73-270.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2881(08)60438-1

Google Scholar

9. Mall, L.P., Billore, S.K. and Amritphale, D. (1982). Certain ecological characteristics on mangroves of Andaman Islands. Tropical Ecology. 23:225-233.

Google Scholar

10. Nameer, P.O., Kumar, B.M. and Minood, C.R. (1992). Floristics, zonation and above ground biomass production in the mangroves of Puduvyppu, Kerala. Indian Journal of Forestry, 15(4):317-325.

Google Scholar

11. Pascal, J.P. (1988). Wet evergreen forests of the Western Ghats of India: Floristics, structure and ecology. Institut de Pondicherry, Tome xxbis 345 p.

12. Simpson, E.H. (1949). Measurement of diversity. Nature, 163: 688.  https://doi.org/10.1038/163688a0

Google Scholar

13. Shannon, C.E. and Wiener, W. (1963). The mathematical theory of communication. University of Illinois Press, Urbana, 320 pp.

14. Soil Survey Staff (SSF) (1992). Keys to soil taxonomy, 5th edition. SMSS Technical Monograph No. 19, SSF, Blacksburg VA, 541 pp.

15. Steve, M. (1993). Mai Po mud flat invertebrate assemblage-changes through one yar. In: Proc. Asia – Pacific symposium on mangrove ecosystems: program and abstracts, Hongkong, 1-3 September 1993. The Hongkong University of Science and Technology.

16. Tamai, S., Nakasuga, T., Tabuchi, R. and Ogino, K. (1986). Standing biomass of mangrove forests in Southern Thailand. Journal of Japanese Forestry Society, 68(9):384-388.

Google Scholar

About this article

How to cite

Suresh Kumar, S. and Mohan Kumar, B., 1997. Floristics, Biomass Production and Edaphic Attributes of the Mangrove Forests of Puduvyppu, Kerala. Indian Journal of Forestry, 20(2), pp.136-143. https://doi.org/10.54207/bsmps1000-1997-BFI92K

Publication History

Manuscript Published on 01 June 1997

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content: