Research Article | Published: 01 December 1997

Possible ancestry and the systematics of the Sudan’s common Mesquite (Prosopis)

Yahya M. Bukhari

Indian Journal of Forestry | Volume: 20 | Issue: 4 | Page No. 341-345 | 1997
DOI: https://doi.org/10.54207/bsmps1000-1997-41F4G3 | Cite this article

Abstract

Cytological and flow-cytometric investigations were performed on Prosopis spp. supplied from different sources, including those ones recently introduced into the Sudan which are known as the Sudan’s ‘Common Mesquite’. The Suda­nese and Kenyan seed sources were tetraploid (2n = 4x = 56), whereas samples of taxa regarded as possible progenitors of the Sudan’s ‘Common Mesquite’ were diploid (2n = 2x = 28). The study suggests that the Sudan’s ‘Common Mesquite’ is neither P. chilensis nor P. juliflora. It is rather an allotetraploid new form. It is also suggested that this tetraploid cytotype is a hybrid product between P. chilensis and P. glandulosa. It is proposed that this hybridization event was followed by a spontaneous chromosome doubling. Flow-cytometric data showed that the mean 2C-values of P. chilensis, P. glandulosa, and the Sudanese Mesquite are 0.853 ± 0.024, 0.827 ± 0.005 and 1.725 ± 0.035 pg, respec­tively. These results propose that P. chilensis and P. glandulosa can be possible progenitors of the mesquite of the Sudan.

Keywords

Access Options

250/-

Buy Full Access in HTML Format

Instant access to the full article.

Get access to the full version of this article. Buy Full Access in HTML Format

References

1. Abdel-Bari, E.A. (1986). The identity of the common mesquite Prosopis spp. Prosopis Project. Pamphlet No. 1. Forestry Research Center, Khartoum, Sudan. 20 pp.

Google Scholar

2. Anamthawat-Jonsson, H., Atipanumpai, L., Tigerstedt, P. M. A. and Tomasson T. (1986). The Feulgen-Giemsa method for chromosome of Betula species. Hereditas, 104(2): 321-322.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1601-5223.1986.tb00547.x

Google Scholar

3. Arumuganathan, K. and Earle E.D. (1991). Estimation of nuclear DNA content of plants by flow-cytometry. Plant Mol. Biol. Repor., 9(3): 229-233.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02672073

Google Scholar

4. Atchison, E. (1951). Studies in the Leguminosae IV. Chromo­some numbers among tropical woody species. Am. J. Bot., 38(7): 538-546.  https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1537-2197.1951.tb14855.x

Google Scholar

5. Bandyopadhyay, B., Nandy, A.K., Mallik, R. and Chatterjee A. (1990). A comparative study on the effect of gamma-irradiation on growth and biomass yield in certain fuel-wood species. Indian For., 116(5): 393-402.

Google Scholar

6. Bosshard, W.C. (1966). Tree species for the arid zone of the Sudan. Pamphlet no 33, Sudan Forest Department and UNDP Forestry Research and Education Project, Khartoum, Sudan. 51 pp.

Google Scholar

7. Brawn, A.F. and Massey, R.E. (1929). Flora of the Sudan.Thomas Murby and Co., 1, Fleet lane. London, E.C.4. 376 pp.

8. Burkart, A. (1976a). A monograph of the genus Prosopis (Leguminosae subfam. Mimosoideae) J. Arnol. Arbor., 57(3): 219-247.  https://doi.org/10.5962/p.185864

Google Scholar

9. Burkart, A. (1976b). A monograph of the genus Prosopis (Leguminosae subfam. Mimosoideae). J. Arnol. Arbor., 57(4): 450-525.  https://doi.org/10.5962/p.324722

Google Scholar

10. Darlington, C.D. and Wylie, A.P. (1955). Chromosome Atlas of flowering plants. George Allen and Unwin Ltd., London. P. 153.

Google Scholar

11. El-Huri, A. (1986). Some aspects of dry-land afforestation in the Sudan with special reference to Acacia tortilis (Fork.) Hayne, A. senegal Willd. and Prosopis chilensis (Molina) Stuntz. For. Ecol. Manage, 16(1-4): 209-221.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-1127(86)90021-6

Google Scholar

12. Felker, P., Clark, P.R., Osborn, J.F., and Cannell, G.H. (1984). Prosopis pod production: comparison of North American, South American, Hawaiian and African germplasm in young plantation. Ecol. Bot., 38(1): 36-51.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02904414

Google Scholar

13. Furuta, Y. and Nishikawa, K (1991). Variation in nuclear and individual chromosomal DNA content and its role in evolution of plants. In: “chromosome engineering in plants, part A. Development in plant genetics and breeding 2A” Gupta and Tsuchiya, eds. Amsterdam, NL Elsevier Scientific Publications: 71-85.  https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-444-88259-2.50008-4

Google Scholar

14. Galbraith, D.W., Harkins, K.R., Maddox, J.M., Ayres, N.M., Sharma, D.P. and Firoozabady E. (1983). Rapid Flow- cytometric analysis of cell cycle in intact plant tissue. Science, 220 (46101): 1049-1051.  https://doi.org/10.1126/science.220.4601.1049

Google Scholar

15. Hunziker, J., Poggio, L., Naranjo, C.A., Palacios, R.A. and Andrada, A.B. (1975). Cytogenetics of some species and natural hybrids in Prosopis (Leguminosae). Can. J. Cytol., 17(2): 253-262.  https://doi.org/10.1139/g75-033

Google Scholar

16. Hunziker, J., Saidman, B.O., Naranjo, C.A., Palacios, R.A., Poggio, L. and Burghardt, A.D. (1986). Hybridization and genetic variation of Argentine species of Prosopis. For. Ecol. Manage., 16(1-4): 301-315.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-1127(86)90030-7

Google Scholar

17. Jackson, J.K. (1960). The introduction of exotic trees into the Sudan. Sudan Silva, 1(1): 14-30.

Google Scholar

18. Leakey, R.R.B. and Last, F.T. (1980). Biology and potential of Prosopis species in arid environments, with particular reference to P. cinerana. J. Arid Environ., 3(1): 13-24.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-1963(18)31672-0

Google Scholar

19. Poggio, L. Burghardt, A.D. and Hunziker, J.H. (1989). Nuclear DNA variation in diploid and polyploid taxa of Larrea (Zygophyllaceae). Heredity, 63(3): 321-328.  https://doi.org/10.1038/hdy.1989.105

Google Scholar

20. Poynton, R.J. (1990). The genus Prosopis in Southern Africa. South African For.,J., 152(1): 62-66.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00382167.1990.9629020

Google Scholar

21. Puro, J. and Nokkala, S. (1977). Meiotic segregation of chromosomes in Drosophila melanogaster oocytes. A cytological approach. Chromosoma, 63(3): 273-286.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00327454

Google Scholar

22. Rawat, M.S., Uniyal, D.P. and Vakshsya, R.K. (1992). Prosopis juliflora (Swartz) DC.: fuel, fodder, and food in arid and semi-arid areas: some observations and suggestions. Indian J. For., 15(2): 164-168.

Google Scholar

23. Sampath, S. and Ramanathan, K. (1949). Chromosome numbers in Indian economical plants III. Curr. Sci., 18(3): 408-409.

Google Scholar

24. Taskinen, O. (1994). Agroforestry for the Sahelian goz soils of the Sudan: potentiality of mesquite (Prosopis juliflora). Department of Forest Ecology, University of Helsinki. Ms. C. Thesis.

25. Wojtusik, T., Felker, P., Russell, E.J. and Benge, M.D. (1993). Cloning of erect, thornless and non-browsed nitrogen fixing trees of Haiti’s principal fuel-wood species (Prosopis juliflora). Agrofor. Systems, 21(3): 293-300.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00705248

Google Scholar

26. Wunder, W.G. (1966). Prosopis juliflora in the arid zone of the Sudan. Pamphlet no. 31. Sudan Forest Department and UNDP Forestry Research and Education Project, Khartoum, Sudan. 29 p.

Google Scholar

About this article

How to cite

Bukhari, Y.M., 1997. Possible ancestry and the systematics of the Sudan’s common Mesquite (Prosopis). Indian Journal of Forestry, 20(4), pp.341-345. https://doi.org/10.54207/bsmps1000-1997-41F4G3

Publication History

Manuscript Published on 01 December 1997

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content: