1. Arce, J.J.C., 2019. Forests, Inclusive and Sustainable Economic Growth and Employment. UNFF14 Background Analytical Study, United Nations Forum on Forests Secretariat, New York, USA, 47 pp.
2. Ashick Rajah, R., Radhakrishnan, S., Balasubramanian, A., Balamurugan, J., Ravi, R., Sivaprakash, M., Sivakumar, B., Hariprasath, C.N., Swathiga, G., Krishnan, S.N., Abbas, G., Vasanth, V., Bora, N.R. and Patil, P.B., 2025. Growth variability of farm-grown teak in response to climatic and soil factors across three agroclimatic zones of Tamil Nadu, India. Scientific Reports, 15, pp.10862. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-92770-7
3. Balakrishnan, S., Ramasamy, Y. and Dev, S.A., 2023. An overview of teak genetic improvement towards conservation of genetic resources in a changing climate with special emphasis on India. Tree Genetics and Genomes, 19, pp.29. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11295-023-01604-y
4. Bhandari, M.S., Meena, R.K., Shankhwar, R., Shekhar, C., Pandey, V.V., Saxena, J., Kant, R., Pandey, S., Barthwal, S., Pandey, S., Chandra, G. and Ginwal, H.S., 2018. Past, present and future of teak (Tectona grandis L.f.) plantations in India. Indian Forester, 144(6), pp.487–502.
5. Bhat, K.M. and Indira, E.P., 1997. Specific gravity as a selection criterion of genetic improvement of teak wood quality: tree breeder's perspective. In: Timber Management toward Wood Quality and End-Product Value. Proceedings of the CTIA/IUFRO International Wood Quality Workshop, 18–22 August 1997, Quebec, Canada. Forintek Canada Corp., Sainte-Foy, pp.VI-21–VI-26.
6. Carle, J., Vuorinen, P. and Del Lungo, A., 2002. Status and trends in global forest plantation development. Forest Products Journal, 52(7/8), pp.12–23.
7. Evans, J. and Turnbull, J.W., 2004. Plantation Forestry in the Tropics: The Role, Silviculture, and Use of Planted Forests for Industrial, Social, Environmental, and Agroforestry Purposes, 3rd Edition. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK, 467 pp.
8. Fernández-Moya, J., Alvarado, A., San Miguel-Ayanz, A. and Marchamalo-Sacristán, M., 2014. Forest nutrition and fertilisation in teak (Tectona grandis L.f.) plantations in Central America. New Zealand Journal of Forestry Science, 44(Suppl. 1), pp.S6. https://doi.org/10.1186/1179-5395-44-S1-S6
9. Goh, D.K.S. and Monteuuis, O., 2012. Behaviour of the 'YSG BIOTECH TG1-8' teak clones under various site conditions: First observations. Bois et Forêts des Tropiques, 311(1), pp.5–19.
10. Grossnickle, S.C., 2012. Why seedlings survive: influence of plant attributes. New Forests, 43, pp.711–738. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11056-012-9336-6
11. Gupta, P.K., Timmis, R. and Mascarenhas, A.F., 1991. Field performance of micropropagated forestry species. In Vitro Cellular and Developmental Biology - Plant, 27, pp.159–164. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02632210
12. Husen, A. and Pal, M., 2007. Metabolic changes during adventitious root primordium development in Tectona grandis Linn. f. (teak) cuttings as affected by age of donor plants and auxin (IBA and NAA) treatment. New Forests, 33, pp.309–323. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11056-006-9030-7
13. IMD, 2024. Climate of Madhya Pradesh. Climatological Summaries of States Series No. 27. IMD Report No. MoES/IMD/CLI-REP(M.P.)/01(2024)/19. Office of the Head, Climate Research and Services, India Meteorological Department, Pune, India, 400 pp.
14. Joshi, A., Tripathi, A., Sharma, N. and Tailor, A., 2024. Somaclonal variation for the improvement of tree species. In: D. Thomas T, M.K. Razdan and A. Kumar (eds), Biotechnological Approaches for Sustaining Forest Trees and Their Products, pp.77–102. Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd., Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-97-4363-6_4
15. Joubert-van der Merwe, L., Samways, M.J. and Pryke, J.S., 2020. A new protocol for monitoring operational outcomes of environmental management in commercial forestry plantations. Journal of Environmental Management, 271, pp.110922. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.110922
16. Kollert, W. and Cherubini, L., 2012. Teak Resources and Market Assessment 2010. FAO Planted Forests and Trees Working Paper FP/47/E, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome, Italy, 41 pp.
17. Kollert, W. and Kleine, M. (eds), 2017. The Global Teak Study: Analysis, Evaluation and Future Potential of Teak Resources. IUFRO World Series Vol. 36, International Union of Forest Research Organizations (IUFRO), Vienna, Austria.
18. Krishnapillay, B., 2000. Silviculture and management of teak plantations. Unasylva, 51(201), pp.14–21.
19. Lwin, O., 2009. Comparative Study on Root Development of Teak (Tectona grandis L.f.) for Different Propagation Methods (Tissue Culture, Rooted Cutting, Seedling) at Different Stages. Research Leaflet No. 15/2009, Forest Research Institute, Forest Department, Ministry of Forestry, Yangon, Myanmar.
20. Marta, S., Lacasella, F., Romano, A. and Ficetola, G.F., 2019. Cost-effective spatial sampling designs for field surveys of species distribution. Biodiversity and Conservation, 28, pp.2891–2908. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-019-01803-x
21. Mehta, P., Rana, B.S., Parihar, A.K.S. and Baksh, H., 2013. Effect of different soil mixtures on growth of teak (Tectona grandis L.f.) seedlings. Indian Journal of Agroforestry, 15, pp.52–55.
22. Mohapatra, A., Nayak, H. and Das, O., 2020. Factors influencing establishment of teak (Tectona grandis Linn. f.) plantation: a review. e-Planet, 18(1), pp.85–94.
23. Pandey, D. and Brown, C., 2000. Teak: a global overview. Unasylva, 51(201), pp.3–13.
24. Payandeh, B. and Ek, A.R., 1971. Observations on spatial distribution and the relative precision of systematic sampling. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 1(4), pp.216–222. https://doi.org/10.1139/x71-029
25. Reddy, B., Kumar, B. and Kalyan, V., 2017. Soil macro nutrient status in teak (Tectona grandis L.f.) and bamboo (Dendrocalamus strictus) plantations in vertisols of Nagpur, India. International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences, 6(11), pp.453–463.
26. Sasidharan, S., 2021. Teak plantations and wood production. In: Y. Ramasamy, E. Galeano and T.T. Win (eds), The Teak Genome, pp.13–25. Springer International Publishing, Cham, Switzerland. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-79311-1_2
27. Tewari, V.P., Sukumar, R., Kumar, R. and Gadow, K.V., 2014. Forest observational studies in India: Past developments and considerations for the future. Forest Ecology and Management, 316, pp.32–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2013.06.050
28. Thomas, B.R., Schreiber, S.G. and Kamelchuk, D.P., 2016. Impact of planting container type on growth and survival of three hybrid poplar clones in central Alberta, Canada. New Forests, 47, pp.815–827. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11056-016-9546-4
29. Wirabuana, P.Y.A.P., Hendrati, R.L., Baskorowati, L., Susanto, M., Mashudi, Sulistiadi, H.B.S., Setiadi, D., Sumardi and Alam, S., 2022. Growth performance, biomass accumulation, and energy production in an age series of clonal teak plantation. Forest Science and Technology, 18(2), pp.67–75. https://doi.org/10.1080/21580103.2022.2063952
30. Zahabu, E., Raphael, T., Chamshama, S.A.O., Iddi, S. and Malimbwi, R.E., 2015. Effect of spacing regimes on growth, yield, and wood properties of Tectona grandis at Longuza Forest Plantation, Tanzania. International Journal of Forestry Research, 2015, pp.469760. https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/469760