Research Article | Published: 01 June 2000

Knockdown Toxicity of Insecticides and B.T. Formulations on Larvae of Teak Defoliator, Hyblaea puera

T. Senguttuvan, C. Chinniah, R. V. Varma and K. S. S. Nair

Indian Journal of Forestry | Volume: 23 | Issue: 2 | Page No. 160-163 | 2000
DOI: https://doi.org/10.54207/bsmps1000-2000-099HAH | Cite this article

Abstract

Laboratory experiments were conducted for assessing the knockdown toxicity of various insecticides and B.t. formulations against third and fourth instar larvae of Hyblaea puera. The results indicated that the mortality of third instar larvae was 85-100 per cent in all insecticides and B. t. formulations within 2 hours of feeding. A new insecticide, Nurelle D 505 at 0.082% and 0.11%. Monocrotophos 0.05%, Quinalphos 0.05% and the B. t. formulations Delfin @ 159 IU/ml were found to cause cent per cent knockdown toxicity within 8 hours after inoculation against fourth instar larvae of H. puera. However, all the 24 HAI. The B. t. formulations were effective even at lower concentrations against third instar and at higher concentrations against fourth instar.

Keywords

Access Options

250/-

Buy Full Access in HTML Format

Instant access to the full article.

References

1. Anonymous (1991). Annual Report AICRP on Biological Control of Crop Pests and Weeds. Project Directorate of Biological Control, Bangalore.

2. Basu Choudhury, J.C. (1971). Interim Report on the Konny Aerial Spaying Project. pp. 165-168. In: Working Plan for Nilambur Forest Division, 1967-68 to 1976-77. (K.G. Vasudevan, ed.). Government of Kerala.

Google Scholar

3. Beeson, C.F.C. (1941). The Ecology and control of the Forest Insects of India and the Neibouring Countries. Govt. of India, New Delhi. 767 pp,

Google Scholar

4. Chatterjee, P.N. and Misra, M.P. (1974). Natural enemy and plant host complex of forest insect pest of Indian region. Indian For. Bull. (New Sr.) Ent., 265:233. pp.

Google Scholar

5. Morris, O.N.; Hildebrand, M.J. and Morre, A. (1981). Comparative effectiveness of three commercial formulations of Bacillus thuringiensis for control of the three Spruce Budworm Choristoneura fumiferana (Clem.). Forest Pest Management Institute, Ontario, Report FPM-X-47 pp. 31.

Google Scholar

6. Murugesan, M.; Gnanamurthy, P. and Subramanian, A.S. (1974). Transformation of experimental data involving percentage. Madras Agric. J., 61:633-636.  https://doi.org/10.1093/biomet/61.3.633

Google Scholar

7. Nair, K.S.S.; Sudheendra Kumar, V.V.; Varma, R.V. and Chacko, K.C. (1985). Studies on the Seasonal Incidence of Defoliators and the Effect of defoliation on Volume Increment of Teak. KFRI Research Report 30, Kerala Forest Research Institute, Peechi, Kerala, 78 pp.

Google Scholar

8. Nair, K.S.S.; Biju Babjan; Sajeev, T.V.; Sudheendrakumar, V.V.; Mohamed Ali, M.I.; Varma, R.V. and Mohanadas, K. (1996). Field efficacy of nuclear polyhedrosis virus for protection of teak against the defoliator, Hyblaea puera. J. Biol. Control. 10:79-85.

Google Scholar

9. Sen-sarma, P.K. and Thapa, R.S. (1981). Recent advances in forest entomology in India. pp. 21-36. In: Recent Advances in Entomology in India (Ananthakrishnan, T.N. Ed.). S. Viswanathan, Printers & Publishers, Madras.

Google Scholar

10. Singh, P. (1980). Aerial spraying to chemicals of Control teak defoliators. Proc. 2nd Forestry Conf., Dehra Dun, India. 9 pp.

Google Scholar

11. Sudheendrakumar, V.V. (1986). Studies on the Natural Enemies of the Teak Pests. Hyblaea puera and Eutectora machaeralis, KFRI Research Report 38. Kerala Forest Research Institute, Peechi, Kerala. 23 pp.

Google Scholar

About this article

How to cite

Senguttuvan, T., Chinniah, C., Varma, R.V. and Nair, K.S.S., 2000. Knockdown Toxicity of Insecticides and B.T. Formulations on Larvae of Teak Defoliator, Hyblaea puera. Indian Journal of Forestry, 23(2), pp.160-163. https://doi.org/10.54207/bsmps1000-2000-099HAH

Publication History

Manuscript Published on 01 June 2000

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content: