Research Article | Published: 01 June 1995

Correlation of Rooting and Other Traits in Mulberry

B. B. Bindroo, S. Baksh, R. K. Fotedar, Anil Dhar and P. Mukherjee

Indian Journal of Forestry | Volume: 18 | Issue: 2 | Page No. 125-128 | 1995
DOI: https://doi.org/10.54207/bsmps1000-1995-3P99S5 | Cite this article

Abstract

Simple correlation co-efficients amongst six metric traits of nine different mulberry genotype groups were worked out. The extent of correlation varied from one-group to the other. Most of the correlations were straight forward, such as number of shoot/plant showing relationship with length of shoots, number of leaves/plant and leaf yield/plant.

Interestingly there was a moderate and positive correlation between the length of shoots and the rooting in all the genotype groups except easy rooter group and the relationship was significant in pooled, medium sprouter, late sprouter, late sprouter and moderate rooter genotype groups. Further, a positive and moderate correlation of rooting was observed to exhibit with number of leaves and the leaf yield in all the genotype groups excepting the three rooter groups (poor, moderate, easy) where the association was very much feeble and insignificant.

Keywords

Access Options

250/-

Buy Full Access in HTML Format

Instant access to the full article.

References

1. Al-Jibouri, H.A., P.A. Miller, H.F. Robinson (1958). Genotypic and environmental variances in an upland cotton cross of interspecific origin. Agron. J., 50:633-637.  https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj1958.00021962005000100020x

Google Scholar

2. Almeida, J.E., A.R. Soares, M.A.P. Ramalho., T.C. Foneca (1991). Phenotypic stability in the mulberry. Sericologia, 13(3), 475-478.  https://doi.org/10.1002/bies.950130908

3. Bari, M.A., M.A. Qaiyyum, S.U. Ahmed (1989). Correlation studies in mulberry (Morus alba L.). Indian J. Seric., 28:11-16.

Google Scholar

4. Bhat, G.G. (1989). Studies on genetic variability and character association analysis in mulberry. M. Phil. Thesis (unpublished), University of Agric. Sci., Bangalore.

Google Scholar

5. Bindroo, B.B., A.K. Tiku, G.N. Javeid (1983). Studies on the propagation of mulberry under temperate climatic conditions Part II. Propagation through soft wood cuttings. In: Abs., Nat. Sem. Silk. Res. Dev., Bangalore. pp. 65.

Google Scholar

6. Bindroo, B.B., Tiku, R.K. Pandit (1990). Variation of some metrical traits in mulberry varieties. The Indian For., 116(4):320-324.

Google Scholar

7. Chattopadhyay, S., S. Chattopadhyay, S.K. Dutta (1990). Quick in vitro production of mulberry (Morus alba) plantlet for commercial purpose. Ind. J. Exp. Biol. 28:522-525.

Google Scholar

8. Das, B.C., S. Krishnaswami (1965). Some observations in interspecific hybridization in mulberry. Ind. J. Seric., 4:108.

Google Scholar

9. Das, B.C., S. Krishnaswami (1969). Estimation of components of variation of leaf yield and its related traits in mulberry. J. Seric. Sci. Japan., 38(2):242-248.

Google Scholar

10. Dewey, D.R., K.H. Lu (1957). A Path analysis of crested grass seed production. Agron. J., 51:515-518.  https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj1959.00021962005100090002x

Google Scholar

11. Gupta, B.K., H. Sau., G. Subra Rao, N.K. Dass (1990). Evaluation of leaf yielding characters of mulberry germ plasm through path analysis. Ind. J. Forestry, 13(1):34-37.

Google Scholar

12. Hartmann, H.T., D.E. Kester (1978). Plant propagation, principles and practices. Prentice Hall of India Pvt. Ltd. 3rd eid.

Google Scholar

13. Mhatre, M., V.A. Bapat, P.S. Rao (1985). Regeneration of plants from the culture of leaves and axillary buds in Mulberry (Morus indica L.). Pl. Cell Reports 4:78-80.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00269211

Google Scholar

14. Narayan, P., S.P. Chakaraborti, K. Sengupta (1991). High frequency regeneration of plant in Morus latifolia L. cy. Goshoerami. J. Tree Sci., 10:41-44.

15. Ogiere, M. (1977). Time for assessing various characters in mulberry breeding. Bull. Seric. Exp. Sta., 27:343-277.

Google Scholar

16. Oka, S., K. Ohyama (1975). Studies on in vitro culture of excised bud in mulberry tree II. Effect of growth substances on the development of shoots from bud. J. Seric. Sci. Japan, 44:444-450.

Google Scholar

17. Rangaswami, G., M.M. Narasimhanna, C.R. Sastry, M.S. Jolly (1976), Sericulture Manual 1. Mulberry cultivation, FAO, Rome.

Google Scholar

18. Sarkar, A., B.N. Roy, K.K. Gupta, B.C. Das (1987). Character association in mulberry under close planting. Ind. J. Seric., 26(3):76-78.

Google Scholar

19. Susheelamma, B.N., M.S. Jolly, K. Giridhar, N.K. Dwivedi, N. Suryanarayanan (1988). Correlation and path analysis in mulberry under stress and non stress conditions. Sericologia, 28:239-249.

Google Scholar

20. Tiku, A.K., B.B. Bindroo (1989). Propagation methods of mulberry germ plasm under temperate conditions. In: Genetic resources of mulberry and utilization Edit. K. Sengupta & S.B. Dandin. pp. 87.

Google Scholar

21. Wai-koon, Tan., Gock-Yong, Tan., P.O. Walton (1978). Genetic variability in acid detergen fibre, crude protein and their association with some morphological characters in smooth Broomegrass. Crop. Sci., 18:119-121.  https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci1978.0011183X001800010031x

Google Scholar

22. Wright, S. (1921). Correlation and causation. J. Agri. Res., 20:557-585.

Google Scholar

About this article

How to cite

Bindroo, B.B., Baksh, S., Fotedar, R.K., Dhar, A. and Mukherjee, P., 1995. Correlation of Rooting and Other Traits in Mulberry. Indian Journal of Forestry, 18(2), pp.125-128. https://doi.org/10.54207/bsmps1000-1995-3P99S5

Publication History

Manuscript Published on 01 June 1995

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content: